When it comes to war movies, World War II reigns supreme. Films like Saving Private Ryan, Dunkirk, and Schindler’s List continue to captivate audiences, while movies about World War I remain relatively rare. But why does the Great War, one of history’s most devastating conflicts, get so little attention in comparison?
Here’s a look at the reasons behind this cinematic disparity.
Cultural Relevance and Distance
World War I is simply further removed from our collective consciousness. The last surviving veterans of the conflict passed away over a decade ago, and many of us have personal or familial connections to World War II instead. This proximity to modern generations makes the Second World War feel more tangible and emotionally resonant.
Additionally, America’s involvement in World War I was limited. The United States only joined the fight in its final 19 months, suffering approximately 53,000 combat deaths. While significant, this pales in comparison to the staggering 400,000 American lives lost in World War II.
Theatrical Appeal and Storytelling
From a visual and narrative perspective, World War II offers far more variety. The global theater stretched from the icy Russian tundra to the tropical shores of the Pacific. Spectacular battles unfolded in exotic settings like Pearl Harbor, Midway Island, and North Africa, while espionage, resistance movements, and high-stakes codebreaking added layers of intrigue.
World War I, by contrast, was defined by its grueling trench warfare, bleak landscapes, and limited strategic creativity. Soldiers spent months in muddy trenches, advancing mere meters at a time. The predominant tactic was charging enemy lines. A strategy with devastatingly high casualties but little cinematic flair.
Morality and Villainy
Perhaps the most defining difference lies in the moral clarity of the two wars. World War II was a battle against some of the most infamous villains in history—the Nazis, whose atrocities and ideology make them perfect antagonists for storytelling. Their stark black-and-white morality provides a dramatic tension that resonates with audiences.
World War I, on the other hand, lacks such clear delineations. Its origins are deeply political and murky, involving alliances, imperial ambitions, and miscalculations. Portraying the complexities of its causes and participants on-screen can be challenging, especially for modern audiences seeking accessible narratives.
Perceptions of Success
Another factor is how these wars are remembered. World War II concluded with the unconditional surrender of Axis powers, leaving an enduring sense of triumph for the Allies. Conversely, World War I ended in disillusionment. Dubbed the “War to End All Wars,” it failed to prevent future conflicts and directly set the stage for World War II. This outcome makes it harder to craft stories with satisfying conclusions.
A Need for More Stories
Despite these challenges, World War I holds untapped potential for filmmakers. Recent works like 1917 and All Quiet on the Western Front have demonstrated that the Great War can deliver compelling, emotional, and visually stunning narratives.
Its staggering scale, with over 15 million deaths and 20 million wounded, ensures there are countless untold stories waiting to be explored. From personal accounts of soldiers to the societal shifts it caused, the Great War has a rich tapestry of material that deserves more attention on the big screen.
